Sounds reasonable. Nevertheless, it should be flagged somewhere. Should it be an issue, or should it be on one of the wiki pages? I searched, but found nothing. Is this the right page? http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ToDoBetterOnLongTerm - on On Apr 9, 2009, at 8:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi Folks,
Are there plans to integrate Monticello 2 into Pharo? (I could not find an issue in the Pharo issues database.)
I understand from Lukas that most of the bootstrapping issues have been resolved. Is anyone on this topic? Is there a good reason to stick with the old MC?
-support -open and public repository aka SS2 -understanding -process -tools
at least for me. So we will but not now our plate is quite full.
Stef
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project