Sounds reasonable.

Nevertheless, it should be flagged somewhere. �Should it be an issue,
or should it be on one of the wiki pages?

I searched, but found nothing.

Is this the right page?

http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ToDoBetterOnLongTerm

- on

On Apr 9, 2009, at 8:54, St�phane Ducasse wrote:

>
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Are there plans to integrate Monticello 2 into Pharo? �(I could not
>> find an issue in the Pharo issues database.)
>>
>> I understand from Lukas that most of the bootstrapping issues have
>> been resolved. �Is anyone on this topic? �Is there a good reason to
>> stick with the old MC?
>
> -support
> -open and public repository aka SS2
> -understanding
> -process
> -tools
>
> at least for me.
> So we will but not now our plate is quite full.
>
> Stef
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project