On 09 Mar 2015, at 18:21, Andrei Chis <chisvasileandrei@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for integrating :)
If settings are just in the Settings Browser very few people will go there and enable them. (Even if I use Pharo a lot I'm still not aware of most settings that I can set in the Settings Browser) Also always showing pop-ups to tell you that you can share enable sending of usage data is kind of annoying. Adding a settings button in the toolbar of spotter seemed like a good compromised.
Agree/disagree? :)
disagree :) here the reason: everybody can think their settings deserve better exposition, and then add a way to change the L&F to add a settings option. that will break inner coherence of Pharo. and we need to think *all tools* in pharo as one unique IDE⦠it has to be coherent. your little cog breaks coherence. I admit we need to do a pass on Settings browser to group better, explain better and remove unnecessary stuff⦠maybe on Pharo5 we will find the time. In the mean time, even without this argument (which I believe is already enough): giving such relevance to an option you will use just once is not good GUI design, sorry :) Esteban
Cheers, Andrei
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 09 Mar 2015, at 17:13, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com <mailto:tudor@tudorgirba.com>> wrote:
We want to add them to the settings window as well.
is the âas wellâ part what does not convinces me: it goes *just* in the settings window, I think :P
Doru
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi,
So⦠I integrated latest GTools. I did it, but I disagree with the relevance the settings of GSpotter have now⦠I understand you want to collect usage, etc⦠but settings should be in settings panel, not âalways on sightâ.
cheers, Esteban
-- www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/>
"Every thing has its own flow"