April 30, 2009
9:21 a.m.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Michael Rueger <m.rueger@acm.org> wrote:
Damien Cassou wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Â <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
Anyone with a win32 system able to confirm that the new image slows heavily down as descibed in [1] using the procedure in [2]?
I confirm it's very slow using Windows XP Pro SP3 on Virtual Box, image 10293.
does someone have a somewhat smaller load sequence we could use to benchmark the difference? Something that runs in a few minutes?
20 minutes on my Ubuntu/Linux 9.04 -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st