[Pharo-project] Slow Image
Astartes wrote:
Anyone with a win32 system able to confirm that the new image slows heavily down as descibed in [1] using the procedure in [2]?
After a first rough test I think it happens after the "Delay" fixes from update 10287/10288
Thx T.
[1] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2009-April/007910.html [2] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2009-April/007934.html
I don't know. Started at 12.48, and is still running at 14.33 :( Stephan
I will give a try on mac. On Apr 28, 2009, at 2:35 PM, stephan@stack.nl wrote:
Astartes wrote:
Anyone with a win32 system able to confirm that the new image slows heavily down as descibed in [1] using the procedure in [2]?
After a first rough test I think it happens after the "Delay" fixes from update 10287/10288
Thx T.
[1] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2009-April/007910.html [2] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2009-April/007934.html
I don't know. Started at 12.48, and is still running at 14.33 :(
Stephan
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
Anyone with a win32 system able to confirm that the new image slows heavily down as descibed in [1] using the procedure in [2]?
I confirm it's very slow using Windows XP Pro SP3 on Virtual Box, image 10293. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
Damien Cassou wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
Anyone with a win32 system able to confirm that the new image slows heavily down as descibed in [1] using the procedure in [2]?
I confirm it's very slow using Windows XP Pro SP3 on Virtual Box, image 10293.
does someone have a somewhat smaller load sequence we could use to benchmark the difference? Something that runs in a few minutes? Michael
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Michael Rueger <m.rueger@acm.org> wrote:
Damien Cassou wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Â <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
Anyone with a win32 system able to confirm that the new image slows heavily down as descibed in [1] using the procedure in [2]?
I confirm it's very slow using Windows XP Pro SP3 on Virtual Box, image 10293.
does someone have a somewhat smaller load sequence we could use to benchmark the difference? Something that runs in a few minutes?
20 minutes on my Ubuntu/Linux 9.04 -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
participants (4)
-
Damien Cassou -
Michael Rueger -
stephan＠stack.nl -
Stéphane Ducasse