On May 16, 2012, at 8:58 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote:
Steph,
I would love to help you with ... I'm overloaded like everyone else, but would squeeze out time for this if it makes sense â¦
Thanks dale. Hernan and one of his students started to work on a solution (not ring based) and we synced now in Sept we will receive him for three months and I hope to get some momentum. I will ask veronica and andy to let us know about their first experience.
Dale
----- Original Message ----- | From: "Stéphane Ducasse" <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> | To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr | Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 11:53:36 AM | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Are we losing method versions? | | yes | | Now we would love to have a database storing all the methods based on | the ring meta model | | | | > Isn't the .changes somehow shrinked before every release? That | > should explain that. | > | > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris | > <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote: | > For DateAndTime class>>#readFrom: ... | > | > In Pharo 1.0, only one version: 'PeterHugossonMiller 9/3/2009 | > 01:10' | > In Pharo 1.2.2, two versions, minus the one from 1.0: | > "#('SeanDeNigris | > 8/5/2010 15:51' 'StephaneDucasse 4/24/2010 12:46')" | > In Pharo 2.0, only the last version from 1.2.2 remains: | > 'SeanDeNigris | > 8/5/2010 15:51' | > | > -- | > View this message in context: | > http://forum.world.st/Are-we-losing-method-versions-tp4630520.html | > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. | > | > | | |