On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 30 Nov 2016, at 21:31, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
I said to nicolas that I should use my super evil power to break iceberg as requested by him. So I tried.
So I went to github and I typed iceberg pharo pharo iceberg passerini iceberg then I browsed pharo-core and related and I could not find anything.
Yes, you are evil; for me it is the 3rd hit: But the project misses a top level description ...
To espouse my pet obsession, searchability is as important for project naming as any ideas evoked by the name. Slight phonetic variations can be useful... iceberg github=220 google=51,500,000 icebirg github=0 google=155,000 "icerberg" github=0 google=42,900** "iciberg" github=1 google=2520** "iceeberg" github=0 google=798** icereberg github=0 google=4 **except here google is tooHelpful correcting spelling and returning 51,500,000 anyway (if quotes don't surround the term). cheers -ben