On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe��<sven@stfx.eu>��wrote:
On 30 Nov 2016, at 21:31, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:

I said to nicolas that I should use my super evil power to break iceberg
as requested by him. So I tried.

So I went to github and I typed
iceberg pharo
pharo iceberg
passerini
iceberg
then I browsed pharo-core and related and I could not find anything.
Yes, you are evil; for me it is the 3rd hit:
But the project misses a top level description ...

To espouse my pet obsession, searchability is as important for project naming��as any ideas evoked by the name. ��
Slight phonetic variations can be useful...��
�� ��iceberg �� �� �� github=220 ��google=51,500,000
�� ��icebirg �� �� �� ��github=0 �� �� ��google=155,000 ��
�� "icerberg" �� ��github=0 �� �� ��google=42,900**��
�� "iciberg" �� �� ��github=1 �� �� �� google=2520**
�� "iceeberg" �� github=0 �� �� ��google=798**
�� ��icereberg �� github=0 �� �� ��google=4

**except here google is tooHelpful correcting spelling and returning 51,500,000 anyway (if quotes don't surround the term).

cheers -ben