2014-01-28 Pharo4Stef <pharo4Stef@free.fr>
On 28 Jan 2014, at 13:53, Pharo4Stef <pharo4Stef@free.fr> wrote:
Ben
I still think that it would have been good to discuss the valueHolder changes in Spec before doing it.
This has been discussed for 2-3 days before I made it actually.
Where? because I do not talk about just the question of sean about the name. But the impact.
I missed that discussion too. And I don't like the name either. I would prefere Binding or ValueBinding. But I am already happe that it does not break code anymore :)
Because it broke the tools of people that used Spec like martin and clement as well as the documentation ignaccio wrote. We should be cautious about other people too.
It actually did not break anything.
ah so you did not remove asValueHolder.
And it had been reverted two days ago
ok good then.
Ben