2014-01-28 Pharo4Stef <pharo4Stef@free.fr>
On 28 Jan 2014, at 13:53, Pharo4Stef <pharo4Stef@free.fr> wrote:

Ben

I still think that it would have been good to discuss the valueHolder changes in Spec
before doing it.

This has been discussed for 2-3 days before I made it actually.

Where? because I do not talk about just the question of sean about the name.
But the impact.

I missed that discussion too.
And I don't like the name either.
I would prefere Binding or ValueBinding.

But I am already happe that it does not break code
anymore :)



Because it broke the tools of people that used Spec like martin and clement
as well as the documentation ignaccio wrote. We should be cautious about other people too.�

It actually did not break anything.

ah so you did not remove asValueHolder.

And it had been reverted two days ago

ok good then.


Ben