MIT Stef On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:12 PM, Noury Bouraqadi wrote:
Hi,
I tried MethodWrappers42 under Pharo 2.0-20370. I've got many tests turn green by simply adding CompiledMetod>>#isMwMethodWrapper that return true. Attached the mcz file.
BTW, what is the license of this project?
Noury
Afin de contribuer au respect de l'environnement,
merci de n'imprimer ce courriel qu'en cas de necessite
Please consider the environment before you print
<MethodWrappers42-NouryBouraqadi.2.mcz> On 16 nov. 2012, at 10:43, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Thanks a lot. I now created another package named MethodWrappers42 (instead of MethodWrappers4.2).
Cheers, Doru
On 15 Nov 2012, at 19:03, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have a little problem with MethodWrappers. Currently, the package is called MethodWrappers4.2 which completely messes up Monticello in Pharo 1.4.
So, we (me and Stef) would like to rename it to MethodWrappers42, but for that we need access to the repository. Marcus, could you provide this access?
I actually don't know what state MW is in... there are multiple ports using multiple strategies. The 42 one is for Squeak, I think.
I added you, after fighting with SqueakSource (Stef I could not find in the list)
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Don't give to get. Just give."
Noury Bouraqadi Ecole des Mines de Douai http://car.mines-douai.fr/noury --