[Pharo-project] method wrappers package name problem
Hi, We have a little problem with MethodWrappers. Currently, the package is called MethodWrappers4.2 which completely messes up Monticello in Pharo 1.4. So, we (me and Stef) would like to rename it to MethodWrappers42, but for that we need access to the repository. Marcus, could you provide this access? Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have a little problem with MethodWrappers. Currently, the package is called MethodWrappers4.2 which completely messes up Monticello in Pharo 1.4.
So, we (me and Stef) would like to rename it to MethodWrappers42, but for that we need access to the repository. Marcus, could you provide this access?
I actually don't know what state MW is in... there are multiple ports using multiple strategies. The 42 one is for Squeak, I think. I added you, after fighting with SqueakSource (Stef I could not find in the list) Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
Hi, Thanks a lot. I now created another package named MethodWrappers42 (instead of MethodWrappers4.2). Cheers, Doru On 15 Nov 2012, at 19:03, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have a little problem with MethodWrappers. Currently, the package is called MethodWrappers4.2 which completely messes up Monticello in Pharo 1.4.
So, we (me and Stef) would like to rename it to MethodWrappers42, but for that we need access to the repository. Marcus, could you provide this access?
I actually don't know what state MW is in... there are multiple ports using multiple strategies. The 42 one is for Squeak, I think.
I added you, after fighting with SqueakSource (Stef I could not find in the list)
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
-- www.tudorgirba.com "Don't give to get. Just give."
Hi, I tried MethodWrappers42 under Pharo 2.0-20370. I've got many tests turn green by simply adding CompiledMetod>>#isMwMethodWrapper that return true. Attached the mcz file. BTW, what is the license of this project? Noury Afin de contribuer au respect de l'environnement, merci de n'imprimer ce courriel qu'en cas de necessite Please consider the environment before you print On 16 nov. 2012, at 10:43, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Thanks a lot. I now created another package named MethodWrappers42 (instead of MethodWrappers4.2).
Cheers, Doru
On 15 Nov 2012, at 19:03, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have a little problem with MethodWrappers. Currently, the package is called MethodWrappers4.2 which completely messes up Monticello in Pharo 1.4.
So, we (me and Stef) would like to rename it to MethodWrappers42, but for that we need access to the repository. Marcus, could you provide this access?
I actually don't know what state MW is in... there are multiple ports using multiple strategies. The 42 one is for Squeak, I think.
I added you, after fighting with SqueakSource (Stef I could not find in the list)
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Don't give to get. Just give."
Noury Bouraqadi Ecole des Mines de Douai http://car.mines-douai.fr/noury --
MIT Stef On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:12 PM, Noury Bouraqadi wrote:
Hi,
I tried MethodWrappers42 under Pharo 2.0-20370. I've got many tests turn green by simply adding CompiledMetod>>#isMwMethodWrapper that return true. Attached the mcz file.
BTW, what is the license of this project?
Noury
Afin de contribuer au respect de l'environnement,
merci de n'imprimer ce courriel qu'en cas de necessite
Please consider the environment before you print
<MethodWrappers42-NouryBouraqadi.2.mcz> On 16 nov. 2012, at 10:43, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Thanks a lot. I now created another package named MethodWrappers42 (instead of MethodWrappers4.2).
Cheers, Doru
On 15 Nov 2012, at 19:03, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have a little problem with MethodWrappers. Currently, the package is called MethodWrappers4.2 which completely messes up Monticello in Pharo 1.4.
So, we (me and Stef) would like to rename it to MethodWrappers42, but for that we need access to the repository. Marcus, could you provide this access?
I actually don't know what state MW is in... there are multiple ports using multiple strategies. The 42 one is for Squeak, I think.
I added you, after fighting with SqueakSource (Stef I could not find in the list)
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Don't give to get. Just give."
Noury Bouraqadi Ecole des Mines de Douai http://car.mines-douai.fr/noury --
On 15 November 2012 17:34, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have a little problem with MethodWrappers. Currently, the package is called MethodWrappers4.2 which completely messes up Monticello in Pharo 1.4.
So, we (me and Stef) would like to rename it to MethodWrappers42, but for that we need access to the repository. Marcus, could you provide this access?
There's also http://www.squeaksource.com/ObjectsAsMethodsWrap.html What are the differences between the two? (I've used the latter, and one flaw I quickly found is that it doesn't (but it's easy to add) allow multiple wrappers around the same CompiledMethod. I have some updates lying around on http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Scratchpad-fbs/) frank
I checked an old name of dale and yes the package name is totally wrong
Yes, `Metacello-Platform.pharo-dale.15` indicates that the package is on the `pharo` branch of the `Metacello-Platform` package.
See GoferVersionReference>>parseName: for parsing rules.
On Nov 15, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
We have a little problem with MethodWrappers. Currently, the package is called MethodWrappers4.2 which completely messes up Monticello in Pharo 1.4.
So, we (me and Stef) would like to rename it to MethodWrappers42, but for that we need access to the repository. Marcus, could you provide this access?
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
participants (5)
-
Frank Shearar -
Marcus Denker -
Noury Bouraqadi -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba