It shouldnât be too intelligent. Keep the default behavior, and for each method add a 3-state checkbox: create (default), skip, force (override). Also having a usage recorder would be nice to know if developers are actually checking the other state more often than the default one. Uko
On 6 Dec 2016, at 13:03, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
2016-12-06 11:34 GMT+01:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com <mailto:dionisiydk@gmail.com>>:
2016-12-06 11:28 GMT+01:00 Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk@me.com <mailto:yuriy.tymchuk@me.com>>: Additionally it was annoying if a superclass has a method with the same name. For example if you have a name var and you create accessors Iâd like to have actually a ânameâ getter and not âname1â
Yes
If you start to make it so intelligent it requires half a dozen click to generate a simple accessor, then people will stop using the refactoring and write the code by hand...
Thierry