On 6 Dec 2016, at 13:03, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:2016-12-06 11:34 GMT+01:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com>:2016-12-06 11:28 GMT+01:00 Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk@me.com>:Additionally it was annoying if a superclass has a method with the same name. For example if you have a name var and you create accessors I���d like to have actually a ���name��� getter and not ���name1���YesIf you start to make it so intelligent it requires half a dozen click to generate a simple accessor, then people will stop using the refactoring and write the code by hand...Thierry