On 13 Apr 2015, at 17:35, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:52, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:49, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:35, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
Yes, that is bad.
Can you write a short mail or issue entry about what you did exactly, so that others can try to debug this situation ?
I did
PharoSourcesCondenser condenseNewSources
and the after the class comment of LargePositiveInteger is empty, the class comment of others are wrong. (e.g. LargeNegativeInteger is
"s ^ separatorsâ
The method sources seem to be ok: I can recompile everything with no problem. (that I tested already some weeks ago not to run into the famous âcondense sources does not workâ issue a day before the release⦠of course, it was not enough).
I think we fixed it⦠slice incoming.
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15336/Writing-a-new-souces-brakes-class-co... <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15336/Writing-a-new-souces-brakes-class-co...> Marcus