On 13 Apr 2015, at 17:35, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:


On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:52, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:


On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:49, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:


On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:35, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:

Yes, that is bad.

Can you write a short mail or issue entry about what you did exactly, so that others can try to debug this situation ?

I did

PharoSourcesCondenser condenseNewSources

and the after the class comment of LargePositiveInteger is empty, the class comment of others are wrong.
(e.g. LargeNegativeInteger is 

"s
^ separators���


The method sources seem to be ok: I can recompile everything with no problem.
(that I tested already some weeks ago not to run into the famous ���condense sources does not work��� issue 
a day before the release��� of course, it was not enough).


I think we fixed it��� slice incoming.

https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15336/Writing-a-new-souces-brakes-class-comments

Marcus