I am confused till now I have been reading that pharo does not care about the past or does not care about being another Smalltalk implementation and it cares only being Smalltalk inspired . What changed in the meant time ? Why so much talk about other Smalltalks and ANSI-Smalltalk ? Nothing we do not diverge for the fun in general. We diverge to improve (of course people can discuss it and think that we are idiots) Now if adding a method in a package can help people porting to Pharo we should not be stupid :)
Stef
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 6:28 AM Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com <mailto:sean@clipperadams.com>> wrote:
Ben Coman wrote >>> Because the proper English spelling is with lowercase > +1.... So it may be useful to have an ANSICompatibility package
+1 to having the proper spelling (that we've fought so hard to have) as the only one in the image. And +1 for a compatibility package if there is a proven demand for such a thing.
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Need-a-decision-on-subString-vs-substring-tp4847932p48... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.