I am confused till now I have been reading that pharo does not care about the past or does not care about being another Smalltalk implementation and it cares only being Smalltalk inspired . What changed in the meant time ? Why so much talk about other Smalltalks and ANSI-Smalltalk ?
Nothing we do not diverge for the fun in general. We diverge to improve (of course people can discuss it and think that we are idiots)
Now if adding a method in a package can help people porting to Pharo we should not be stupid :)

Stef


On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 6:28 AM Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
Ben Coman wrote
>>> Because the proper English spelling is with lowercase
> +1.... So it may be useful to have an ANSICompatibility package

+1 to having the proper spelling (that we've fought so hard to have) as the
only one in the image. And +1 for a compatibility package if there is a
proven demand for such a thing.



-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Need-a-decision-on-subString-vs-substring-tp4847932p4848193.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.