On 14 February 2012 17:07, Guido Stepken <gstepken@googlemail.com> wrote:
Am 14.02.2012 16:57, schrieb Igor Stasenko:
On 14 February 2012 15:07, Hernan Wilkinson <hernan.wilkinson@10pines.com> Â wrote:
Well... this is an example of what the "thread" was about at the beginning... that is, the lack of knowledge on software development... I you have known a little bit about architecture, multi-threading and vm implementation, you would quickly realize that pharo will not scale as a server. Squeak (where pharo comes from) was not design/implemented to be used as a server (and please, don not take this bad, I don't want to be unworthy with Pharo because it is changing and getting better with every realease)
There's no reason to take it bad, because you stating the truth.
So, if you want to do a "serious enterprise" application, you should have used and architecture prepare for that such as GemStone (GLASS in this case)... it is a pity you lost so much money due to you "lack" of knowledge.
People who taking it serious also first discover the area of possibility, which implies talking to people and asking questions.
I never seen from Guido questions like "does it scales if i run it standalone etc". And that means that he's not any serious with his harsh statements, just trolling.
Lookup Google "Pharo hanging" ... very few companies are really using Pharo, but i am not the only one reporting this.
Look for "rails hanging" - ~ 11 million hits Look for "C# hanging" , java hanging etc now if this is the only criteria, on which you basing your choice, then i feel sorry for you, because you cannot use any software made in this world. so, have fun hacking.
Tnx for the "troll".
Have fun hacking, Guido Stepken
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.