On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 September 2011 19:52, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
Hi!
Apparently, the following method is abstract:
ArrayedCollection>>add: newObject self shouldNotImplement
If I evaluate: (ArrayedCollection>>#add:) isAbstract => true
This is not quite right. A method that is cancelled is not abstract.
I propose to change CompiledMethod>>abstractMarkers ^ #(subclassResponsibility shouldNotImplement)
into CompiledMethod>>abstractMarker ^ #shouldNotImplement
Does it make sense?
yes
Why? It doesn't for me. A method defined as ^ self subclassResponsibility is "abstract" from my point of view.
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com