On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 September 2011 19:52, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Apparently, the following method is abstract:
>
> ArrayedCollection>>add: newObject
> � � � �self shouldNotImplement
>
> If I evaluate:
> (ArrayedCollection>>#add:) isAbstract => true
>
> This is not quite right. A method that is cancelled is not abstract.
>
> I propose to change
> CompiledMethod>>abstractMarkers
> � � � �^ #(subclassResponsibility shouldNotImplement)
>
> into
> CompiledMethod>>abstractMarker
> � � � �^ #shouldNotImplement
>
> Does it make sense?
>

yes


Why? It doesn't for me. A method defined as ^ self subclassResponsibility� is "abstract" from my point of view.



> Cheers,
> Alexandre
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel �http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.




--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com