Having looked at the support for WSDL interpretation in Pharo/Squeak recently we decided to go RESTful instead ;-) For us we prefer to be more dynamic, not to say that a general WSDL-based interface could not be done without creating new classes though. Regards, Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: Guillermo Polito To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 6:23 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Webservices (any update) I don't think so... (But I didn't use it in a real environment yet, so I can be wrong :) ). I've only saved it in squeaksource, made it load into pharo (1.1 las year) and built a metacello configuration because it uses Kom. On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger@freyther.de> wrote: On 09/27/2011 02:01 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote: > A year ago I introduced SoapOpera into squeaksource... But he needs someone > to take care of it :) since I've never had time to do it. > > http://www.squeaksource.com/SoapOpera Hi, is there code to use/adopt a WSDL file? holger