Having looked at the support for WSDL interpretation in Pharo/Squeak recently we decided to go RESTful instead ;-)

For us we prefer to be more dynamic, not to say that a general WSDL-based interface could not be done without creating new classes though.

Regards, Gary

----- Original Message -----

From: Guillermo Polito

To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr

Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 6:23 PM

Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Webservices (any update)

I don't think so... (But I didn't use it in a real environment yet, so I can be wrong :) ). I've only saved it in squeaksource, made it load into pharo (1.1 las year) and built a metacello configuration because it uses Kom.

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger@freyther.de> wrote:

On 09/27/2011 02:01 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
> A year ago I introduced SoapOpera into squeaksource... But he needs someone
> to take care of it :) since I've never had time to do it.
>
> http://www.squeaksource.com/SoapOpera

Hi,

is there code to use/adopt a WSDL file?

holger