Ahh yeah. Youâre right, I read it too quick and in the wrong context and thought was talking about Purism in programming languages giving only functional as example. Never mind about that page⦠And yet we could start one where we could talk about it. Here is an idea: LISP: "Everything is an Expressionâ Haskell and Miranda: "Everything is a Functionâ Self and Smalltalk: "Everything is an Object" could easily do a wikipedia page on âParadigmatic Programming Languagesâ or something like that Iâm not an academic but sounds like their beach and sounds to me it could be quite a reference
On Nov 28, 2014, at 2:08 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 28 Nov 2014, at 16:55, Sebastian Sastre <sebastian@flowingconcept.com> wrote:
Hi guys,
Just a heads upâ¦
This is asking for a fix: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_(programming_language)
LISP and Self and Smalltalk people should add their voice there
Unleash your nerd :)
I don't understand, what do you mean ?
The page describes some language called Pure that seems to be legit, so what is wrong with that (apart from the name being ambitious, pretentious) ?
And there is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharo which is OK but needs some love.