Ahh yeah. You���re right, I read it too quick and in the wrong context and thought was talking about Purism in programming languages giving only functional as example.

Never mind about that page���

And yet we could start one where we could talk about it.

Here is an idea:

LISP: "Everything is an Expression��� 
Haskell and Miranda: "Everything is a Function��� 
Self and Smalltalk: "Everything is an Object"

could easily do a wikipedia page on ���Paradigmatic Programming Languages��� or something like that

I���m not an academic but sounds like their beach and sounds to me it could be quite a reference





On Nov 28, 2014, at 2:08 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:


On 28 Nov 2014, at 16:55, Sebastian Sastre <sebastian@flowingconcept.com> wrote:

Hi guys,

Just a heads up���

This is asking for a fix:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_(programming_language)

LISP and Self and Smalltalk people should add their voice there

Unleash your nerd :)

I don't understand, what do you mean ?

The page describes some language called Pure that seems to be legit, so what is wrong with that (apart from the name being ambitious, pretentious) ?

And there is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharo which is OK but needs some love.