On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:41 , Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:36, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:15, Henrik Johansen <henrik.s.johansen@veloxit.no> wrote:
On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:34 , Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On 21 Jul 2014, at 09:44, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
On 21/7/14 08:46, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
I do not know if there are back ends for something else than mongo in Voyage.
certainly not for GOODS :) actually we have just âin memoryâ and âmongoâ (in memory works fine when deploying on gemstone, for example) I always want to add more backends but well⦠time, time, timeâ¦
Esteban
Iâm intending to add one for Riak, in an unspecified amount of time, depending on my other workload⦠Iâd like it performant, and use a client up to date with the latest Riak API, which (afaict) means using the ProtoBuffer protocol, which means having to implementing PB first.
It would be good to have a ProtoBuffers implementation that is separate.
I agree, keeping the building blocks separate is nice :) Cheers. Henry