On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:41 , Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:


On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:36, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:


On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:15, Henrik Johansen <henrik.s.johansen@veloxit.no> wrote:


On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:34 , Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:


On 21 Jul 2014, at 09:44, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:


On 21/7/14 08:46, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
DALI
http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/DALi.html

VOYAGE
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~estebanlm/Voyage

I do not know if there are back ends for something else than mongo in Voyage.

certainly not for GOODS :)
actually we have just �in memory� and �mongo� (in memory works fine when deploying on gemstone, for example)
I always want to add more backends but well� time, time, time� 

Esteban

I�m intending to add one for Riak, in an unspecified amount of time, depending on my other workload�
I�d like it performant, and use a client up to date with the latest Riak API, which (afaict) means using the ProtoBuffer protocol, which means having to implementing PB first.

It would be good to have a ProtoBuffers implementation that is separate.

I agree, keeping the building blocks separate is nice :)

Cheers.
Henry