I just tried the new example on the website (factorial is a great example from the command line - I like it). The output is: $ ./pharo Pharo.image eval "42 factorial" 'No change' 1405006117752879898543142606244511569936384000000000 $ Out of curiosity, What is the âNo Changeâ message above the answer? Tim
On 29 Nov 2016, at 08:41, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
yes, but no need⦠I already fixed it :)
On 29 Nov 2016, at 09:29, phil@highoctane.be <mailto:phil@highoctane.be> wrote:
Report them on pharo.fogbugz.com <http://pharo.fogbugz.com/>
http://pharo.org/contribute-report-bug <http://pharo.org/contribute-report-bug>
Use Project: Websites as the reference.
Phil
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works <mailto:tim@testit.works>> wrote: Hi Guys - how is the best way to report website and text bugs?
As I know the English is not always a first language (and you guys are busy writing code anyway) - its up to us native English speakers to chip in where we can.
I was pleased to get the notice that on OSX Sierra I need to do something extra to get Pharo to work, however the text could be slightly corrected eg. (Bolded words changed)
Are you using macOS Sierra? Due to changes in security policies of macOS, you will need to put the VM in the /Applications folder. We are working to fix this temporary inconvenience.
Also - the Hello world command line example on the front page doesnât work on a standard Terminal on a Mac (you get an error:
$ ./pharo Pharo.image eval "Stdio stdout << 'Hello,World!'" -bash: !'": event not found
The culprit is of course the â!â Character so a better example might be:
$ ./pharo Pharo.image eval "Stdio stdout << 'Hello World'" Hello WorldStdioStream: 'stdout'
Although, in this case, is it expected that the return string is merged with some other output text (e.g. the StdioStream:â¦.?). I think its an impressive example, but it just doesnât quite look right?
Tim