On 2 April 2010 01:26, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab@anest.ufl.edu> wrote:
Sig,
SIXX will do what you describe, but I respectfully submit that you are missing the point - worse, you appear to be going out of your way to obfuscate it: there are indeed objects (classes are among them) that require specialized serialization.
sorry, can't parse it. What you mean by obfuscating the point what i missing? I never said that classes doesn't require special handling. What i tried to point out, that being able to serialize any object in right way will make it much easier to deal with classes.
Bill
-----Original Message----- From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Igor Stasenko Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 4:36 PM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] serializing a class
On 1 April 2010 23:02, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi
I would like to do a little experiment. I need to save a class (not the instances) in a binary format and I was wondering if somebody got experience with that.
I'd rather change the 'class' to an 'object' in your question. Mainly, the problem is to file-out an object-memory subgraph, with predefined stub points, and then load it into another object memory and reconnect these stubs.
Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.