Good luck with it. cheers -ben On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 5:17 AM, henry <henry@callistohouse.club> wrote:
I am preparing an Internet Draft for submission through IETF. Listed below.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bob<robert.withers@protonmail.com> Date: On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 13:56 Subject: Fwd: Re: [saag] Fw: [internet-draft-draft] ParrotTalk: Anonymous P2P encryption To: Bob <robert.withers@protonmail.com> Cc: SAAG <saag@ietf.org> I updated the I-D located here: http://jmp.sh/VRejS2g
Thank you for your consideration, - HH
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [saag] Fw: [internet-draft-draft] ParrotTalk: Anonymous P2P encryption Local Time: November 3, 2017 9:07 AM UTC Time: November 3, 2017 1:07 PM From: robert.withers@protonmail.com To: SAAG <saag@ietf.org>
Good morning,
I am forwarding this announcement of the ParrotTalk v3.6 specification and 2 reference implementations, in Squeak/Pharo and Java, to the SAAG list. I was advised that this mailing list regarding the Security Area is the correct home for this announcement. Below, I corrected the version of the Squeak/Pharo ParrotTalk code to version 11, interoperable with the Java version. I am proceeding to work on the Internet-Draft and I hope some discussion builds around this work.
Thank you. - HH
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [internet-draft-draft] ParrotTalk: Anonymous P2P encryption Local Time: November 2, 2017 9:19 PM UTC Time: November 3, 2017 1:19 AM From: henry@callistohouse.club To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
I have developed the ParrotTalk Protocol, and am starting an internet draft document[1] for submission to the process at IETF.
ParrotTalk Protocol is documented in part here[2], while I have two implementations: 1 in Squeak/Pharo[3 a/b] and the other in Java[4 a/b]. The particulars of MAC key and ivSequence derivation, as well as constrained traffic signing, are the implementations, yet missing from the specification. They will be added to the internet-draft.
How do I go about submitting a specification for ParrotTalk for IETF review and consideration?
Thank you.
- HH - HH - HH - HH - HH - HH - HH - HH