Good luck with it.
cheers -ben

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 5:17 AM, henry <henry@callistohouse.club> wrote:
I am preparing an Internet Draft for submission through IETF. Listed below.


Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bob<robert.withers@protonmail.com>
Date: On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 13:56
Subject: Fwd: Re: [saag] Fw: [internet-draft-draft] ParrotTalk: Anonymous P2P encryption
To: Bob <robert.withers@protonmail.com>
Cc: SAAG <saag@ietf.org>
I updated the I-D located here: http://jmp.sh/VRejS2g

Thank you for your consideration,
- HH

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [saag] Fw: [internet-draft-draft] ParrotTalk: Anonymous P2P encryption
Local Time: November 3, 2017 9:07 AM
UTC Time: November 3, 2017 1:07 PM
To: SAAG <saag@ietf.org>

Good morning,

I am forwarding this announcement of the ParrotTalk v3.6 specification and 2 reference implementations, in Squeak/Pharo and Java, to the SAAG list. I was advised that this mailing list regarding the Security Area is the correct home for this announcement. Below, I corrected the version of the Squeak/Pharo ParrotTalk code to version 11, interoperable with the Java version. I am proceeding to work on the Internet-Draft and I hope some discussion builds around this work.

Thank you.
- HH

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [internet-draft-draft] ParrotTalk: Anonymous P2P encryption
Local Time: November 2, 2017 9:19 PM
UTC Time: November 3, 2017 1:19 AM
From: henry@callistohouse.club
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>

I have developed the ParrotTalk Protocol, and am starting an internet draft document[1] for submission to the process at IETF.

ParrotTalk Protocol is documented in part here[2], while I have two implementations: 1 in Squeak/Pharo[3 a/b]��and the other in Java[4 a/b]. The particulars of MAC key and ivSequence derivation, as well as constrained��traffic signing, are the implementations, yet missing from the specification. They will be added to the internet-draft.

How do I go about submitting a specification for ParrotTalk for IETF review and consideration?

Thank you.

- HH
- HH
- HH
- HH
- HH
- HH
- HH
- HH