On 18. 12. 2010 22:02, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
let's start to get more political here:
- first did VW ever considered any community?
Yep, in 90's and start of new millenium. but this is unrelated question.
- second does it make sense not to change?
This is also unrelated question to Andreas observations.
- third what is a better smalltalk?
This is again unrelated question to Andreas observations. I any case, struggling to take care about a Smalltalk wide communty while working in our narrower subcommunities like Pharo, Aida, Seaside etc. is certainly a good and noble goal. Isn't that so? Best regards Janko
Yes of course been fragmented is bad but this is like that. Stef
On Dec 18, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
- reliable (new) squeaksource which includes a one-click image so one can easy setup an own (internal) server
I want a smalltalksource for all Smalltalk dialects. And I don't want to fear that any company or manager gone wild could cancel it. Really, the Smalltalk community is small and fragmented, and every dialect is trying to have its own version management and project hosting. This is really bad IMHO. So many things got already lost or are fallen into oblivion because they were hosted somewhere nobody knows or cares anymore.
Sigh, Andreas
-- Janko Mivšek AIDA/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si