On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Stéphane Ducasse < stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi ramon
Yes I know now I was wondering why we got this in the *sixx category?
Because a changeset I harvested had a method in a *sixx category. This was a mistake (I should have delted it before filing it in). Marcus
Stef
On Dec 23, 2008, at 10:37 PM, Ramon Leon wrote:
Subject: [Pharo-project] there is a sixx left over in Object
sixxInstVarNamed: instVarName put: aValue "override if you like" self instVarAt: (self class instVarIndexFor: instVarName asString) put: aValue
Does anybody know where is come from?
It's from the SIXX package, see Universe / Persistence / SIXX. SIXX is an XML serializer/deserializer written in Smalltalk.
Ramon Leon http://onsmalltalk.com
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Marcus Denker -- denker@iam.unibe.ch http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker