On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:04 PM, St�phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:

Hi ramon

Yes I know
now I was wondering why we got this in the *sixx category?

Because a changeset I harvested had a method in a *sixx category. This was a mistake (I should have

delted it before filing it in).

Marcus

Stef

On Dec 23, 2008, at 10:37 PM, Ramon Leon wrote:

>> Subject: [Pharo-project] there is a sixx left over in Object
>>
>> sixxInstVarNamed: instVarName put: aValue
>> "override if you like"
>> self
>> instVarAt: (self class instVarIndexFor:
>> instVarName asString)
>> put: aValue
>>
>> Does anybody know where is come from?
>
> It's from the SIXX package, see Universe / Persistence / SIXX. SIXX
> is an
> XML serializer/deserializer written in Smalltalk.
>
> Ramon Leon
> http://onsmalltalk.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project