LOLWAT! :D for what is worth, my experience.. I donât know mercurial and I was ~8 months flirting with git and in a relationship since ~4 Git is okay Exposing the code out there in a way others can use their familiar commands to test our software is something I find very healthy But for us, automation is the real winner and git kind of helped with it (not that is a total requisite, but it was a way to have both âprofitsâ in one move) On Mar 6, 2014, at 7:34 PM, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs@gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
My dream has finally come true ... Smalltalkers arguing the merits of git vs. mercurial!
Alternate implementations to FileTree are welcome!
Dale
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz> wrote:
The integration in Newspeak is quite different. It is file based, above mercurial (which makes no difference) but the tools one uses are in Newspeak. So mercurial really is just a back-end. Given that organizations and alphabetical order of selectors within protocols, classes within categories, etc, keeps things stable I find mercurial diffs are still pretty readable with file-specific command-line or GUI tools. Method-level granularity seems a very poor choice, IMNSHO.
+1. In St/X I do exactly the same. Works just fine.
Jan