LOLWAT! :D

for what is worth, my experience..

I don�t know mercurial and I was ~8 months flirting with git and in a relationship since ~4

Git is okay

Exposing the code out there in a way others can use their familiar commands to test our software is something I find very healthy 

But for us, automation is the real winner and git kind of helped with it (not that is a total requisite, but it was a way to have both �profits� in one move)





On Mar 6, 2014, at 7:34 PM, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs@gemtalksystems.com> wrote:

My dream has finally come true ... Smalltalkers arguing the merits of git vs. mercurial!

Alternate implementations to FileTree are welcome!

Dale


On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz> wrote:


The integration in Newspeak is quite different.  It is file based, above
mercurial (which makes no difference) but the tools one uses are in
Newspeak.  So mercurial really is just a back-end.  Given that
organizations and alphabetical order of selectors within protocols,
classes within categories, etc, keeps things stable I find mercurial
diffs are still pretty readable with file-specific command-line or GUI
tools.  Method-level granularity seems a very poor choice, IMNSHO.


+1.
In St/X I do exactly the same. Works just fine.

Jan