On 30 Dec 2013, at 09:51, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 30 Dec 2013, at 08:29, Johan Brichau <johan@inceptive.be> wrote:
On 29 Dec 2013, at 22:16, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
yeah, but I also remember a discussion of ânow, sources should be always (and just there) with vm⦠or the oppositeââ¦
imho, it seems more appropriate to keep them with the image since itâs the image that determines the Pharo version and not the vm.
Keeping them with the VM makes for easier sharing (just one copy, never think of it again, run images from everywhere). These are different styles I guess.
We need to get rid of it. The mental overhead it produces is costing far more then the memory it saves (and now we soon have 2014, so if it was âtoo much memoryâ for Pharo3, it will by definition not be for Pharo4 thanks to time passingâ¦) Marcus