I personally never liked the name âSciSmalltalkâ. âSciPharoâ is much better in my opinion PhaNum is also okay to me. Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Mar 2, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:
SciPharo? Not so great news from my POV. What is so much pharo specific in this library? Is Smalltalk scientific community large enough for yet another split?
2016-03-02 14:56 GMT+01:00 Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com <mailto:serge.stinckwich@gmail.com>>: On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com <mailto:tudor@tudorgirba.com>> wrote:
This is great news!
I would be interested in time series and distributions as well.
Distributions are already there. I start some early work on time series.
-- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ <http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/>