Just wondering, did you actually see this page: http://pharo.org/success ? This is all real, commercially successful stuff. Not that we don't need more traction, but it is important to understand and know what is already there.
On 05 Jan 2015, at 16:41, horrido <horrido.hobbies@gmail.com> wrote:
SRP has poster children.
But seriously, Pharo is the "poster child". Seaside and Amber are the poster children representing the web.
I'm focussed on Amber because I firmly believe that Smalltalk must have a good client-side story. The web is so important to the future of Smalltalk.
Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote
Yes I know, and it *is* an interesting project, for sure.
But my remark was in the context of The Smalltalk Renaissance - does it really fit ? Is it the best poster child ?
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/On-Twitter-tp4797177p4797863.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.