Yes but also I do not want that people think that I want to have less Squeak on the pharo page. To me a Pharo page should be about: all the history about the squeak fork is now history for me. As a newbie I wante to get excited by pharo not understand the history of ant fighting while elephants are running around. The license story is also a pain. I would move all that into history. Stef
You mean in the sense of the "conflict of interest" that Wikipedians love to throw around? (Ron Teitelbaum had to deal with lots of pain when writing up Andreas' page.)
frank
On 28 March 2013 12:21, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse@free.fr> wrote:
I could but I do not want people bash me if I focus on Pharo on that page.
Stef
On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
have you seen it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharo
it is old, small, non-accurate and well... it could receive a lot of love :) (the weird thing is that the image is actually a 2.0 image, he)
Can anyone adopt the page and update it?
thanks, Esteban
ps: also... we have a lot of spanish speakers in this list (including myself). It is a shame that we do not have a spanish version :)