I like the ability I have to generate big and interesting threads from a little question hahaha. On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:55 PM, <csrabak@bol.com.br> wrote:
Em 15/10/2009 04:50, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> escreveu:
I see. Eiffel ideas cross breeding Pharo Smalltalk!
The idea is that one day or later we will have to think about the benefit of pre and post condition. So assert: in object makes a lot of sense.
Now indeed it would be good that all the tests use assert: without block and use should: for that case.
Stef On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:55 AM, csrabak@bol.com.br wrote:
> I don't either, but I find strange the complete hierarchy of > classes of Pharo having a method assert: available. Perhaps > I'm blindfolded and Pharo and Squeak have found a wider use > for assertions?
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project