>
> � � The idea �is that one day or �later we will have �to think about
> � � the benefit �of pre �and post condition. � So assert: �in object
> � � makes a lot of sense.
>
> � � Now �indeed it �would be �good that �all the �tests �use assert:
> � � without block and use should: for that case.
>
> � � Stef On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:55 AM,
csrabak@bol.com.br wrote:
>
> � � > I don't either, �but I find strange the �complete hierarchy of
> � � > classes of �Pharo having �a method assert: �available. Perhaps
> � � > I'm blindfolded �and Pharo and �Squeak have found a �wider use
> � � > for assertions?
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project