Feb. 15, 2012
12:56 p.m.
Yes, 4-5 manyears? So, why reinventing the wheel, like with COGVM? LLVM ist much better supported by big, big, commercial companies.
Yes, LLVM has a great track-record of easing the development of dynamic languages. http://qinsb.blogspot.com/2011/03/unladen-swallow-retrospective.html