thanks for the update. Stef On May 24, 2010, at 2:42 AM, Julian Fitzell wrote:
The fact that MC2 is still a moving target. Or at least it would be if it was moving. :) More to the point, the early releases had some problems that prompted further redesign and I'd recommend against creating large amounts of date in those versions that will need to be brought forward. In other words, I don't think it's ready for prime time in its current state.
Julian
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Geert Claes <geert.wl.claes@gmail.com> wrote:
What would be the biggest challenges moving to MC2 and a MC2 Repository like SourceTalk?
Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi Geert. I agree it would awesome to have Monticello 2 and SourcTalk for Pharo 1.2. I have not idea the status. I tested once (you can see squeakdbx there) but I have a lot of problems. And the project seems "dead". I mean, I don't think someone is working on it. That said, it would be great someone to work on it and maybe start to using it by Pharo 1.2
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Metacello-and-SourceTalk-tp2219294p2219517.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project