[Pharo-project] Metacello and SourceTalk ...
SourceTalk/Monticello 2 hasn't been top priority because there have been plenty of other more urgent matters that required attention. Maybe with all the discussion around Metacello, Repositories, Pharo Release, Code Freeze, Continuous Integration etc ... it may be a good idea to use this momentum to look at SourceTalk/Monticello 2 again? The name SourceTalk probably makes more sense with the idea of the Repository serving the Squeak and Pharo communities. SourceTalk should probably also remove the need for projects to use Google Code simply for its Wiki and Issue Tracker. A number of other "Ideas To Implement" (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/IdeasToImplement) have already made it to the next stage. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Metacello-and-SourceTalk-tp2219294p2219294.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Geert. I agree it would awesome to have Monticello 2 and SourcTalk for Pharo 1.2. I have not idea the status. I tested once (you can see squeakdbx there) but I have a lot of problems. And the project seems "dead". I mean, I don't think someone is working on it. That said, it would be great someone to work on it and maybe start to using it by Pharo 1.2 Cheers Mariano On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Geert Claes <geert.wl.claes@gmail.com>wrote:
SourceTalk/Monticello 2 hasn't been top priority because there have been plenty of other more urgent matters that required attention.
Maybe with all the discussion around Metacello, Repositories, Pharo Release, Code Freeze, Continuous Integration etc ... it may be a good idea to use this momentum to look at SourceTalk/Monticello 2 again? The name SourceTalk probably makes more sense with the idea of the Repository serving the Squeak and Pharo communities. SourceTalk should probably also remove the need for projects to use Google Code simply for its Wiki and Issue Tracker.
A number of other "Ideas To Implement" (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/IdeasToImplement) have already made it to the next stage. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Metacello-and-SourceTalk-tp2219294p2219294.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
What would be the biggest challenges moving to MC2 and a MC2 Repository like SourceTalk? Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi Geert. I agree it would awesome to have Monticello 2 and SourcTalk for Pharo 1.2. I have not idea the status. I tested once (you can see squeakdbx there) but I have a lot of problems. And the project seems "dead". I mean, I don't think someone is working on it. That said, it would be great someone to work on it and maybe start to using it by Pharo 1.2
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Metacello-and-SourceTalk-tp2219294p2219517.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The fact that MC2 is still a moving target. Or at least it would be if it was moving. :) More to the point, the early releases had some problems that prompted further redesign and I'd recommend against creating large amounts of date in those versions that will need to be brought forward. In other words, I don't think it's ready for prime time in its current state. Julian On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Geert Claes <geert.wl.claes@gmail.com>wrote:
What would be the biggest challenges moving to MC2 and a MC2 Repository like SourceTalk?
Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi Geert. I agree it would awesome to have Monticello 2 and SourcTalk for Pharo 1.2. I have not idea the status. I tested once (you can see squeakdbx there) but I have a lot of problems. And the project seems "dead". I mean, I don't think someone is working on it. That said, it would be great someone to work on it and maybe start to using it by Pharo 1.2
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Metacello-and-SourceTalk-tp2219294p2219517.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
thanks for the update. Stef On May 24, 2010, at 2:42 AM, Julian Fitzell wrote:
The fact that MC2 is still a moving target. Or at least it would be if it was moving. :) More to the point, the early releases had some problems that prompted further redesign and I'd recommend against creating large amounts of date in those versions that will need to be brought forward. In other words, I don't think it's ready for prime time in its current state.
Julian
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Geert Claes <geert.wl.claes@gmail.com> wrote:
What would be the biggest challenges moving to MC2 and a MC2 Repository like SourceTalk?
Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi Geert. I agree it would awesome to have Monticello 2 and SourcTalk for Pharo 1.2. I have not idea the status. I tested once (you can see squeakdbx there) but I have a lot of problems. And the project seems "dead". I mean, I don't think someone is working on it. That said, it would be great someone to work on it and maybe start to using it by Pharo 1.2
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Metacello-and-SourceTalk-tp2219294p2219517.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (4)
-
Geert Claes -
Julian Fitzell -
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Stéphane Ducasse