On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 17 June 2012 01:30, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
Igor Stasenko wrote
because 'announcer weak subscribe: ' is explicit
Either way, something is implicit. Why not make the common case implicit
and
the uncommon one slightly more verbose? "Make common things easy, rare things possible"
I bet if you do that, some people will be alienated/antagonized by this change (oh... its really hard to make everyone happy).
As a compromise i would suggest to force people to explicitly tell their intent.. i.e. if they want to subscribe strongly, then they should say:
announcer strong on:..
and weakly, is
announcer weak on:..
but if they do:
announcer on:
they shall get a DNU/error.
He, I like that!
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.