On 17 June 2012 01:30, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
>
> Igor Stasenko wrote
>>
>> because 'announcer weak subscribe: ' is explicit
>>
>
> Either way, something is implicit. Why not make the common case implicit and
> the uncommon one slightly more verbose? "Make common things easy, rare
> things possible"
>

I bet if you do that, some people will be alienated/antagonized by
this change (oh... its really hard
to make everyone happy).

As a compromise i would suggest to force people to explicitly tell
their intent.. i.e.
if they want to subscribe strongly, then they should say:

announcer strong on:..

and weakly, is

announcer weak on:..

but if they do:

announcer on:

they shall get a DNU/error.

--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.