Nov. 12, 2015
9:15 a.m.
On 12 November 2015 at 09:04, Christophe Demarey <Christophe.Demarey@inria.fr> wrote:
Le 10 nov. 2015 à 21:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
<< Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >>
Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).
Any reason to prefer one or the other?
While they're both compatibility layers, Grease is a portability layer _for Seaside_, while Sport is a portability layer for time, sockets, and files. frank