Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?
If Swazoo is available, I guess Sport will be too because it depends on it. Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo
Thanks Le 10/11/15 01:43, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Sport/Sport
Stephan
On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote:
Thanks
I assume you want it working in Pharo5? There was no #'pharo5.x' Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16 Author: StephanEggermont Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15 In-place pharo5 version added
thanks! Le 10/11/15 10:03, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote:
Thanks
I assume you want it working in Pharo5? There was no #'pharo5.x'
Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16 Author: StephanEggermont Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15
In-place pharo5 version added
anyone care to explain what Sport is , the project description does not help. On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:33 PM stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
thanks!
Le 10/11/15 10:03, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote:
Thanks
I assume you want it working in Pharo5? There was no #'pharo5.x'
Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16 Author: StephanEggermont Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15
In-place pharo5 version added
<< Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >> Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).
On 10 Nov 2015, at 21:27, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios@gmail.com> wrote:
anyone care to explain what Sport is , the project description does not help.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:33 PM stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote: thanks!
Le 10/11/15 10:03, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote:
Thanks
I assume you want it working in Pharo5? There was no #'pharo5.x'
Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16 Author: StephanEggermont Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15
In-place pharo5 version added
Thank you Sven that clears it up for me, sounds interesting project :) On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:40 PM Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
<< Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >>
Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).
On 10 Nov 2015, at 21:27, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios@gmail.com> wrote:
anyone care to explain what Sport is , the project description does not help.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:33 PM stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote: thanks!
Le 10/11/15 10:03, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote:
Thanks
I assume you want it working in Pharo5? There was no #'pharo5.x'
Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16 Author: StephanEggermont Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15
In-place pharo5 version added
I would like to see what is needed and if we can improve Pharo libraries :) Le 10/11/15 21:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
<< Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >>
Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).
On 10 Nov 2015, at 21:27, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios@gmail.com> wrote:
anyone care to explain what Sport is , the project description does not help.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:33 PM stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote: thanks!
Le 10/11/15 10:03, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote:
Thanks I assume you want it working in Pharo5? There was no #'pharo5.x'
Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16 Author: StephanEggermont Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15
In-place pharo5 version added
Le 10 nov. 2015 à 21:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
<< Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >>
Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).
Any reason to prefer one or the other?
On 12 November 2015 at 09:04, Christophe Demarey <Christophe.Demarey@inria.fr> wrote:
Le 10 nov. 2015 à 21:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
<< Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >>
Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).
Any reason to prefer one or the other?
While they're both compatibility layers, Grease is a portability layer _for Seaside_, while Sport is a portability layer for time, sockets, and files. frank
Le 12 nov. 2015 à 10:15, Frank Shearar a écrit :
On 12 November 2015 at 09:04, Christophe Demarey <Christophe.Demarey@inria.fr> wrote:
Le 10 nov. 2015 à 21:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
<< Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >>
Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).
Any reason to prefer one or the other?
While they're both compatibility layers, Grease is a portability layer _for Seaside_, while Sport is a portability layer for time, sockets, and files.
ok, thanks
participants (7)
-
Christophe Demarey -
Dimitris Chloupis -
Esteban A. Maringolo -
Frank Shearar -
Stephan Eggermont -
stepharo -
Sven Van Caekenberghe