Dale: after some discussions in Pharo mailing list, the community wants to use the Lukas repository for OB instead of wiresong. I don't know the impact it makes to you, and I don't know the best way to manage this kind of situations. Right now, I create a new version and baselind to ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser that maps to Lukas repo and I change a little the dependencies, and, of course, the versions. Any thougths about this? Cheers Mariano On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs@gemstone.com>wrote:
just fine..thanks ----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
| On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Dale Henrichs | <dale.henrichs@gemstone.com>wrote: | | > | > ----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote: | > | > | So far, I created: ConfigurationOfNewInspector, | > | ConfigurationOfOCompletion, | > | ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser, ConfigurationOfPharoMorphicExtras, | > | ConfigurationOfPharoSound, ConfigurationOfRefactoringBrowser, | > | ConfigurationOfShout , and......ConfigurationOfPharo!!! | > | > Mariano, | > | > I'm working on a ConfigurationOfOmneBrowser that works on both | Squeak and | > Pharo (and ultimately GemStone ...). | > | > Would you prefer that I start a new baseline/version or just | overwrite 1.0? | > | > | Hi Dale. Good we are working in OB. This weekend / next-week I want | to | create a PharoDev image with OB so maybe I would rather if you can | create a | new baseline (taking 1.0 as a base) and if you want, later we can | "merge" if | necessary. | | What do you think ? Is this ok for you ? | | | > I lean towards overwriting, especially this early in the process, | but I | > want your opinion. | > | > Dale | > | > _______________________________________________ | > Pharo-project mailing list | > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr | > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | >